Current:Home > StocksTexas sues to stop a rule that shields the medical records of women who seek abortions elsewhere -MoneyBase
Texas sues to stop a rule that shields the medical records of women who seek abortions elsewhere
View
Date:2025-04-15 17:59:31
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas has sued the Biden administration to try to block a federal rule that shields the medical records of women from criminal investigations if they cross state lines to seek abortion where it is legal.
The lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services seeks to overturn a regulation that was finalized in April. In the suit filed Wednesday in Lubbock, Republican state Attorney General Ken Paxton accused the federal government of attempting to “undermine” the state’s law enforcement capabilities. It appears to be the first legal challenge from a state with an abortion ban that took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the nationwide right to abortion.
The rule essentially prohibits state or local officials from gathering medical records related to reproductive health care for a civil, criminal or administrative investigation from providers or health insurers in a state where abortion remains legal. It is intended to protect women who live in states where abortion is illegal.
In a statement, HHS declined comment on the lawsuit but said the rule “stands on its own.”
“The Biden-Harris Administration remains committed to protecting reproductive health privacy and ensuring that no woman’s medical records are used against her, her doctor, or her loved one simply because she got the lawful reproductive care she needed,” the agency said.
Texas’ abortion ban, like those in other states, exempts women who seek abortions from criminal charges. The ban provides for enforcement either through a private civil action, or under the state’s criminal statutes, punishable by up to life in prison, for anyone held responsible for helping a woman obtain one.
It’s not clear whether public officials have sought patient medical records related to abortion. But the state has sought records related to gender-affirming care, demanding them from at least two out-of-state health centers last year. Like many Republican-controlled states, Texas bans gender-affirming care for minors.
At least 22 Democratic-controlled states have laws or executive orders that seek to protect medical providers or patients who participate in abortion from investigations by law enforcement in states with bans.
The federal regulation in question is an update to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which prohibits medical providers and health insurers from divulging medical information about patients. Typically, however, law enforcement can access those records for investigations.
A group of Republican attorneys general, all from states with strict abortion laws, had urged Health and Human Services to ditch the rule when a draft was released last year. In a 2023 letter to HHS, the group said the regulation would unlawfully interfere with states’ authority to enforce laws.
“With this rule, the Biden Administration makes a backdoor attempt at weakening Texas’s laws by undermining state law enforcement investigations that implicate medical procedures,” Paxton said in a news release.
Liz McCaman Taylor, senior federal policy counselor at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said federal law has long provided enhanced protection for sensitive health information.
“But Texas is suing now, not because of its concern with state sovereignty, but because of its hostility to reproductive health,” she said.
__
Associated Press reporter Jamie Stengle contributed from Dallas.
veryGood! (714)
Related
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Inspired by King’s Words, Experts Say the Fight for Climate Justice Anywhere is a Fight for Climate Justice Everywhere
- Illinois Now Boasts the ‘Most Equitable’ Climate Law in America. So What Will That Mean?
- Corn-Based Ethanol May Be Worse For the Climate Than Gasoline, a New Study Finds
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Nature’s Say: How Voices from Hawai’i Are Reframing the Climate Conversation
- Timeline: The disappearance of Maya Millete
- Justice Department threatens to sue Texas over floating border barriers in Rio Grande
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- 45 Lululemon Finds I Predict Will Sell Out 4th of July Weekend: Don’t Miss These Buys Starting at $9
Ranking
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- 2 youths were killed in the latest fire blamed on an e-bike in New York City
- Corn-Based Ethanol May Be Worse For the Climate Than Gasoline, a New Study Finds
- A tech consultant is arrested in the killing of Cash App founder Bob Lee
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- No, the IRS isn't calling you. It isn't texting or emailing you, either
- Inside Clean Energy: In a Week of Sobering Climate News, Let’s Talk About Batteries
- California Regulators Banned Fracking Wastewater for Irrigation, but Allow Wastewater From Oil Drilling. Scientists Say There’s Little Difference
Recommendation
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
Amazon Prime Day Early Deal: Save 47% on the TikTok-Loved Solawave Skincare Wand That Works in 5 Minutes
Inside Clean Energy: Here’s Why Some Utilities Support, and Others Are Wary of, the Federal Clean Energy Proposal
Glee’s Kevin McHale Recalls Jenna Ushkowitz and Naya Rivera Confronting Him Over Steroid Use
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Is the Paris Agreement Working?
Illinois Solar Companies Say They Are ‘Held Hostage’ by Statehouse Gridlock
UN Report Says Humanity Has Altered 70 Percent of the Earth’s Land, Putting the Planet on a ‘Crisis Footing’