Current:Home > MyHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -MoneyBase
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:14:00
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (68247)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Kate Middleton Takes Style Note From Princess Diana With Bold Red Look
- Larsa Pippen Has the Best Response When Asked About 16-Year Age Difference With Boyfriend Marcus Jordan
- Below Deck's Captain Lee Rosbach Finally Returns After Leaving Season 10 for Health Issues
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Tom Cruise hangs on for dear life to his 'Mission' to save the movies
- Halsey Looks Nearly Unrecognizable During Terrifying and Amazing Paris Fashion Week Modeling Debut
- Charlie Sheen and Denise Richards' Daughter Sami Sheen Shares Bikini Photos From Hawaii Vacation
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- 'Nimona' is a shapeshifting fantasy about embracing your true self
Ranking
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- BET Awards honor hip-hop as stars pay tribute to legends such as Tina Turner
- After 12 years of civil war, the last thing Syrians needed was an earthquake
- Some advice from filmmaker Cheryl Dunye: 'Keep putting yourself out where you belong'
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Mrs. Davis' First Teaser Asks You to Answer a Mysterious Call
- A new documentary on the band Wham! shows the 'temporal nature of youth'
- An Orson Welles film was horribly edited — will cinematic justice finally be done?
Recommendation
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
24-Hour Flash Deal: Make Cooking Easier and Save $40 on Ninja Speedi Rapid Cooker and Air Fryer
King Charles III gives brother Edward a birthday present: His late father's Duke of Edinburgh title
Prosthetics can cost up to $70,000. This influencer is running a marathon on crutches
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
Rumor sends hundreds of migrants rushing for U.S. border at El Paso, but they hit a wall of police
See Joseph Gordon Levitt Make His Poker Face Debut as Natasha Lyonne's Charlie Is in Big Trouble
An Orson Welles film was horribly edited — will cinematic justice finally be done?