Current:Home > InvestWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -MoneyBase
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
View
Date:2025-04-27 21:07:47
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- This Is Not a Drill: Save $60 on the TikTok-Loved Solawave Skincare Wand That Works in 5 Minutes
- Why Tom Holland Says Zendaya Had a Lot to Put Up With Amid His Latest Career Venture
- Warmer Temperatures May Offer California Farmers a Rare Silver Lining: Fewer Frosts
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Britney Spears hit herself in the face when security for Victor Wembanyama pushed her hand away, police say
- Ben Stiller and Christine Taylor Make Rare Red Carpet Appearance With 21-Year-Old Daughter Ella
- There's a shortage of vets to treat farm animals. Pandemic pets are partly to blame
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- With Coal’s Dominance in Missouri, Prospects of Clean Energy Transition Remain Uncertain
Ranking
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Entrepreneurs Built Iowa’s Solar Economy. A Utility’s Push for Solar Fees Could Shut Them Down.
- Trump special counsel investigations cost over $9 million in first five months
- What Will Kathy Hochul Do for New York Climate Policy? More Than Cuomo, Activists Hope
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Nordstrom Rack 62% Off Handbag Deals: Kate Spade, Béis, Marc Jacobs, Longchamp, and More
- Covid-19 and Climate Change Threats Compound in Minority Communities
- An Indiana Church Fights for Solar Net-Metering to Save Low-Income Seniors Money
Recommendation
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
No New Natural Gas: Michigan Utility Charts a Course Free of Fossil Fuels
Cities Pressure TVA to Boost Renewable Energy as Memphis Weighs Breaking Away
Binance was once FTX's rival and possible savior. Now it's trying not to be its sequel
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Warming Trends: The Value of Natural Land, a Climate Change Podcast and Traffic Technology in Hawaii
Andy Cohen Reveals the Raquel Leviss Moment That Got Cut From Vanderpump Rules' Reunion
Katie Holmes Rocks Edgy Glam Look for Tribeca Film Festival 2023